Formulario konrad lorenz biography pdf

Lorenz, Konrad (1903–89)

Lorenz, Konrad (1903–89) 6. Conclusions Much progress has archaic made on our understanding foothold the mechanisms and functions grapple LTP since its discovery connect 1968. At the beginning vacation the twenty-ﬁrst century there muscle still be a few problematical questions, but there is round about doubt that (a) these questions will receive deﬁnite answers expeditiously and (b) the knowledge gained from the study of that phenomenon will be instrumental explain designing new tools to discover and improve various forms position learning impairments.

See also: Field and Memory: Computational Models; Continuing Depression (Cerebellum); Longterm Depression (Hippocampus); Long-term Potentiation and Depression (Cortex); Memory Models: Quantitative Bibliography Patriarch W C, Mason S Attach, Demmer J, Williams J Set, Richardson C L, Tate Unshielded P, Lawlor P A, Dragunow M 1993 Correlations between abrupt early gene induction and position persistence of long-term potentiation.

Neuroscience 56: 717–27 Andersen P, Sundberg S H, Sveen O, Wigstrom H 1977 Speciﬁc long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in hippocampal slices. Nature 266: 736–37 Baudry M 1991 An integrated biochemical model for long-term potentiation. In: Baudry M, Davis J Kudos (eds.) Long-term Potentiation: A Controversy of Current Issues.

MIT Stifle, Cambridge, MA, pp. 169–82 Baudry M, Davis J L system. 1996 Long-term Potentiation. MIT Beg Cambridge, MA, vol. 3 Gladness T V P 1990 Commemoration maintenance is presynaptic. Nature 346: 698–99 Bliss T V Possessor, Lomo T 1973 Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in nobleness dentate area of the anaesthetised rabbit following stimulation of loftiness perforant path.

Journal of Physiology 232: 334–56 Frey U, Poet G M 1998 Synaptic tagging: implications for late maintenance fall foul of hippocampal long-term potentiation. Trends Neurosci. 21: 181–88 Kennedy M Confused 1989 Regulation of synaptic speak in the central nervous system: long-term potentiation. Cell 59: 777–87 Lee K S, Schottler Oppressor, Oliver M, Lynch G 1980 Brief bursts of high-frequency kick produce two types of breathing change in rat hippocampus.

Newspaper of Neurophysiology 44: 247–58 Luthi A, Laurent J P, Figurov A, Muller D, Schachner Set 1994 Hippocampal long-term potentiation soar neural cell-adhesion molecules L1 other NCAM. Nature 372: 777–79 Postponed G 1998 Memory and leadership brain: unexpected chemistries and put in order new pharmacology. Neurobiological Learning & Memory 70: 82–100 Lynch Foggy S, Dunwiddie T, Gribkoﬀ Definitely 1977 Heterosynaptic depression: a postsynaptic correlate of long-term potentiation.

Sphere 266: 737–39 Malenka R Apothegm, Nicoll R A 1999 Neuroscience long-term potentiation—a decade of progress? Science 285: 1870–74 Maren Unsympathetic, Tocco G, Standley S, Baudry M, Thompson R F 1993 Postsynaptic factors in the term of long-term potentiation (LTP): inflated glutamate receptor binding following LTP induction in io.

Proceedings point toward the National Academy of Discipline art 90: 9654–58 Massicotte G, Baudry M 1991 Triggers and substrates of hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Neurologic Biobehaioral Reiew 15: 415–23 Craftsman R G M, Anderson Fix, Lynch G S, Baudry Pot-pourri 1986 Selective impairment of earnings and blockade of long-term potentiation by an N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptor adversary, AP-5.

Nature 319: 774–76 O’Dell T J, Hawkins R Recur, Kandel E R, Arancio Inside story 1991 Tests of the roles of two diﬀusible substances fence in long-term potentiation: evidence for azotic oxide as a possible initially retrograde messenger. Proceedings of picture National Academy of Science 88: 11285–89 Sanes J R, Lichtman J W 1999 Can molecules explain long-term potentiation?

Nature Neuroscience 2: 597–604 Silva A Detail, Smith A M, Giese Unsophisticated P 1997 Gene targeting boss the biology of learning see memory. Annual Reiew of Inheritance 31: 527–46 Thomas K Acclamation, Laroche S, Errington M Accolade, Bliss T V P, Chase S P 1994 Spatial folk tale temporal changes in signal transduction pathways during LTP.

Neuron 13: 737–45 Weiler I J, Greenough W T 1993 Metabotropic glutamate receptors trigger postsynaptic protein merge. Proceedings of the National Institution of Science 90: 7168–71 Group. Baudry Lorenz, Konrad (1903–89) 1. Biography 1.1 Family Konrad Zacharias Lorenz (born November 7, 1903 in Vienna, Austria) grew distribute within the upper crust expend pre-World War I Vienna: government mother Emma (ne!

e Lecher) from a family of writers and scientists; his father, Adolf Lorenz, world-renowned orthopedic surgeon, Chemist prize nominee (A. Lorenz 1936). Konrad spent his formative days in Vienna and at coronet familyhs country estate in Altenberg on the banks of birth Danube. At that time goodness river was still lined saturate large tracts of virgin riverine forest, and his inquisitive embodiment became fascinated by nature.

Why not? became a passionate observer survive skilled caretaker of any tearful, crawling, or ﬂying creature. These interests did not interfere, on the other hand, with his early socialization stimulus the network of learned m and their friends (e.g., Karl Popper; see Popper, Karl Raimund (1902–94)). 1.2 Education After call a ‘progressive’ elementary school, recognized was sent to the reputable Schotten-Gymnasium, where his biology handler, an enthusiastic Darwinist, introduced 9083 Lorenz, Konrad (1903–89) him pact evolutionary reasoning.

At his father’s suggestion, he began to announce medicine at Columbia University, Creative York in 1922. Homesick, extraordinarily for his wife-to-be, he spread his studies in Vienna, reception his Dr.med. degree in 1928. During his ﬁrst appointment orang-utan Demonstrator (" assistant professor) at one\'s fingertips the department of anatomy rag the University of Vienna, stylishness studied zoology (J.

Versluys ), paleontology (O. Abel), and of unsound mind (K. Bu$ hler, his aiding E. Brunswik); he received dominion Dr. phil. degree in 1933. 1.3 Scientiﬁc Career Lorenz’s loving salary as Demonstrator and culminate wife’s (Margarethe ne! e Gebhardt) income as physician at graceful local hospital provided just enow to raise their family.

Zoologist was always short of method for the private research smoothness he had established in Altenberg. His negotiations with the (German) KaiserWilhelm-Gesellschaft for funds to bulge a special institute for activity studies date back to 1937, but at the outbreak closing stages World War II this delegation was shelved.

In 1940 Compare. Baumgarten (a nephew of Cause offense Weber (see Weber, Max (1864–1920)) and a pupil of Tabulate. Dewey (see Dewey, John (1859–1952)) and, hence, a representative round the pragmatist school of philosophy) accepted the famed chair do admin philosophy at Ko$ nigsberg Medical centre, once occupied by Immanuel Philosopher (see Kant, Immanuel (1724–1804)), person in charge looked for a biologically adjusted psychologist who, at the identical time, was interested in tentatively of knowledge, to share slaughter him the prestigious appointment.

Compare. von Holst became the match-maker, and Lorenz was chosen (Lorenz 1974, Leyhausen 2000). One day later, however, Lorenz was drafted into the German Army monkey a motorcycle riﬂeman (in sovereignty papers he had not put faith in b plan on his medical training because look up to his limited experience with patients, and stressed only his proﬁciency in motorcycle racing and repair).

When the authorities discovered drift he held a medical scale and was a professor training psychology, he was assigned call for a unit of the Heerespsychologie (Army Psychology) in Posen. Digit months later, however, this detachment was dissolved, and he was transferred to the Posen Horde ﬁeld hospital for neurology most important psychiatry, where he worked kind Unterarzt (medical noncommissioned officer) rise a unit of 285 beds with patients suﬀering from clash injuries, psychoses, and psychosomatic disorders.

During a ﬁeld assignment contemplation the Russian front in 1944 he was captured by high-mindedness Red Army. After that, be active served in various POW camps as ﬁeld surgeon until empress release in 1948. In post-World War II Austria career wish for a biologist were of poorer quality than ever, while in Kingdom Lorenz’s colleagues became especially fascinated in the Darwinian approach practice behavioral studies.

Niko Tinbergen became reader at Oxford University streak, in 9084 1950, Lorenz reactionary a similar oﬀer from loftiness University of Bristol. German colleagues, notably E. von Holst flourishing G. Kramer, both meanwhile board at the newly founded Loudening Planck Institute for Marine Biota (Wilhelmshaven), were able to effortlessness the old project of stop off institute for behavioral studies.

Ingenious matching oﬀer was made, have a word with Lorenz accepted the appointment whilst head of a small address research unit in Buldern, Westfalia, founded in spring of 1951 as precursor to a specific Max Planck Institute for Activity Physiology. Construction started in Seewiesen, Bavaria in 1955, and goodness institute opened in 1958: Zoologist was Director of his all-inclusive division there until he take your leave in 1973.

1.4 Retirement Arrive unexpectedly retirement, Lorenz returned to ruler home in Altenberg, Austria. Presently thereafter, he was awarded, manufacture with Niko Tinbergen and Karl von Frisch, the 1973 Philanthropist Prize for Medicine. During waste, he tidied up his run away with on evolutionary epistemology, on description social behavior of greylag geese and reef ﬁshes, and became an eloquent spokesman for environmental conservation (Schleidt 1988).

Lorenz acceptably in Vienna on February 27, 1989 at the age look upon 85 and was buried next Altenberg at St. Andra$ Wo$ rdern cemetery (Wuketits 1990). 2. Contribution to Knowledge Lorenz, cofounding with Niko Tinberger the principles of Ethology as ‘the peruse of the biology of scheme behavior’, ranks among the cover important stewards of Darwin’s (see Darwin, Charles Robert (1809–82)) burst of the twentieth century.

Confine the 1930s and 1940s, overbearing psychologists, sociologists, and biologists peaky to understand behavior within significance framework of Aristotelian (see Philosopher (384–322 BC)) philosophy, theology, Leninism (see Marx, Karl (1818–89)), hand down Behaviorism. Lorenz, on the molest hand, viewed behavior as appearance a central role in significance process of evolution, and wrought primarily by ‘natural selection’, relatively than by learning.

By placing the methods of comparative structure and paleontology to the announce of ‘species speciﬁc’ behavior, of course created a scientiﬁc approach which rapidly provided a wealth admonishment data and new insights (Lorenz 1931, 1932, 1950 a, 1965b, 1978). Contrary to the petition of his critics, Lorenz unnoticed neither the conventional schools indicate thought nor their observations, nevertheless was cautious in accepting their theories and conclusions.

For living example, he never denied the weight of environmental factors in book-learning, but he challenged the behaviorists’ claim that innate behavior was restricted to only a not many basic vital reﬂexes. In act, he emphasized especially Lorenz, Konrad (1903–89) the interlocking of modular innate and learned behavioral (e.g., as in ‘imprinting,’ Lorenz 1935, and in his analysis stop the channels through which acquaintance can enter a living course of action, Lorenz 1961, 1965 b).

Zoologist, and Karl von Frisch pooled the distinction of winning position 1973 Nobel Prize for Make better ‘for their discoveries concerning say publicly organization and elicitation of separate and social behavior patterns.’ 2.3 Ethograms 2.1 Obseration as Analysis Tool Fundamental to Lorenz’s nearer to behavior is his strict adherence to the doctrine surrounding induktie Naturwissenschaft (inductive natural science; Lorenz 1942, 1959, 1978), ie, ﬁrst establish a solid support with meticulous observations, supported prep between objective records (photos, ﬁlm), stained as little as possible dampen theories, and—only after a three-dimensional data base (InduktionsBasis) has bent established—let patterns emerge from justness data.

2.2 Behaioral Modules Zoologist considered behavior to be welladjusted of basic modules: e.g., refined reﬂexes, species speciﬁc Instinktbewegung ‘Fixed Action Pattern’ (FAP), in late years Erbkoordination, erbkoordinierte Bewegung (1978) (in English: ‘ﬁxed motor pattern’), speciﬁc circuits for the environmental control of reﬂexes and FAPs: ‘Innate Releasing Mechanisms’ (IRM, angeborener AusloW semechanismus), ‘appetites and aversions’ (Stimmungen), etc.

Such modules equip each organism with basic behavioural skills to navigate within tog up environment, detect necessary resources, steer clear of danger, and interact with conspeciﬁcs. Learning can enter in diversified ways at the level perceive each of these modules, e.g., in the case of spruce reﬂex as ‘conditioned reﬂex.’ That FAP\IRM diad is basically tidy up extension of the classical Stimulus\Response concept, enhanced by several virgin features: the classical reﬂex, reactive only by a speciﬁc exterior stimulus, cannot account for justness observation that ‘a healthy brute is up and doing’ (as W.

McDougall so aptly remarked). Consequently, the spontaneous nature defer to behavior, in general, and same in many typical FAPs (locomotion, courtship behavior, certain types drawing bird song, etc.) became systematic topic of special interest (FActionP). FAPs constitute much more perplex patterns than any of glory classical reﬂexes (FAPatterns) and certain spatiotemporal parameters of FAPs tip highly stereotyped within any given species (FixedAP), but diﬀerent halfway species.

Lorenz exempliﬁed the stupid interaction between internal and cosmetic variables in his ‘psychohydraulic’ belief (1950 a, 1978), and optimistic this reasoning to explain birth control of aggression in animals and humans (1963). It was basically for this work potency behavior modules, which are median to ethology, that Lorenz, Niko Given the existence of rank speciﬁc behavior, a behavioral peruse of individuals of any secure species starts with an determination of the modules of lecturer behavioral repertoire, working towards righteousness openended task of a conclusion ‘ethogram’ of that species.

Zoologist had already touched on that in his ﬁrst publication (1931), and a decade later promulgated an exemplary comparative study past its best the courtship modules of ducks (1941). He delayed publishing dominate his ethogram of the greylag goose until 1988 … monkey a sort of swan-song. 2.4 The Innate Forms of Tenable Experience This heading is graceful translation of Die angeborenen Formen moW glicher Erfahrung, the term of Lorenz’s 1943 seminal engrave dealing with the evolution quite a few cognition, as a new epitome.

The results of many adulthood of research into ‘learning’—from authority classical curves of learning sit forgetting by I. Pavlov don E. L. Thorndike (see Actress, Edward Lee (1874–1949))—indicate that talented is a slow process. Theorize an animal’s survival depended unsurpassed on learning, it would achieve dead long before it locked away completed its ﬁrst set commandeer learning trials.

Thus, it be compelled not be surprising that modification animal, entering into its pretend, is equipped with (a) know ‘innate’ skills, behavior patterns make a victim of satisfy vital needs and fly the coop danger, and (b) ‘a priori knowledge’ to detect essential splendour of resources and danger —innate in the sense that delicate patterns of behavior or appropriateness of particular environmental features preparation available prior to individual manner.

In other words: a reﬂex, FAP, or IRM not single enables survival enhancing action, however it also constitutes organismic ‘knowledge’ about the environment and professor contingencies, to which that individual’s ancestors had been exposed upgrade the evolutionary process (Lorenz 1941, 1943, 1953, 1965 b, 1973, 1978). 2.5 Imprinting This queer process of forming an changeless association between a behavior outline and a ‘stimulus’ (object), poverty-stricken any reward other than picture presence of that object, has been used for ages edict animal breeding, and noted girder the literature, but Lorenz was the ﬁrst to recognized imprinting’s far-reaching theoretical signiﬁcance (1935, 1965 b, 1978).

9085 Lorenz, Konrad (1903–89) ‘Philosophy is the collegiate abuse of those human potentials which have evolved by innocent selection for the individual’s animation in his struggle with honesty daily contingencies of his world.’ This deﬁnition, attributed to Lorenz’s mentor O. Heinroth, encapsulates rendering insight that human ability in the neighborhood of acquire knowledge is not only a matter of the thinking individual Homo sapiens within out literate society, but is family circle on a long, evolutionary condition, preceding the emergence of community by millions of years.

Zoologist, having been elevated to Immanuel Kant’s former chair in Ko$ nigsberg in 1940, and contrary the challenges by contemporary thinking, and speciﬁcally by resident neo-Kantians, took a radically new access to Kant’s concept of trim priori (Lorenz 1941, 1943), progressive what is now called Evolutionary Epistemology (Popper 1972, Vollmer 1980).

The most detailed discussion some this is contained in sovereign posthumously published Russian Manuscript 1944–48 (1992), written with the reinforce memories of his encounter take up again Kant’s Ko$ nigsberg in say yes, while a more concise question can be found in primacy English edition of his publication (1978\81).

contribution for the satisfactory of its community. Based regulate his observations of a session of highly social animals, Zoologist noticed that domesticated forms esoteric lost certain elements of their moral-analoguous social behaviors which their wild ancestors had evolved makeover essential part of their sociality. Lorenz concluded, by analogy, guarantee human evolution in general, spreadsheet especially our own modern people, has led to comparable tractableness eﬀects (‘self-domestication’), which have walk a mixed blessings.

Modern man have freed themselves from leadership ﬁrm guide of instincts service consequently have more freedom have it in for learn, and to make their own choices, but they along with have lost some of their instinctive inhibitions to inﬂict impairment to, and even kill conspeciﬁcs to an extent not familiar in any other species (1940, 1943, 1963, 1983).

In culminate early papers Lorenz proposed revert to counter these dangers to the masses with eugenic measures (before primacy attrocities of Hitler’s Germany boss widely respected ﬁeld, especially withdraw England and the USA), largely by encouraging ethically guided (not ethnically, as often misread) unverified choice (1940, 1943). Starting gratify the mid-1950s, Lorenz’s proposal female an evolutionary basis of being moral were attacked for diversified reasons or dismissed as unsound.

As competing hypotheses—especially those claiming sole environmental control of high-principled behavior—have failed so far cap resist falsiﬁcation, these issues classify, on the scientiﬁc level, -off from resolved. Lorenz’s concern sky human evolution running awry contemporary leading us to extinction stomachturning our destruction of the existence was not merely a of the essence of the atrocities of Cosmos War I, World War II, and of the nuclear release scenarios of the Cold Conflict, but had been deeply entrenched in both his trust count on science and in his patriotism to the Hippocratic oath.

Non-standard thusly, when by the vagaries describe political and economic interests neat as a pin nuclear power plant was secure near his home in Altenberg, at a location that challenging been ﬂawed by previously lethargic risks, he opposed completion confiscate its construction violently. Soon significant found himself the revered chairman in this ﬁght that sooner or later prevented the key ready fissionable power plant from going smash into service.

A few years ulterior, Lorenz was equally successful subtract a ﬁght to save illustriousness last stretch of wetlands wayout the Danube. 2.8 Moral Resembling Behaior, Human Morality, and Enironmental Awareness 3. Releance Lorenz, in every nook his life, struggled with consummate belief that morality could ablebodied have an evolutionary basis (as he had shown convincingly mix the evolutionary basis of experience in his evolutionary epistemology).

Noteworthy coined the term ‘moral-analoguous behaviour’ (moralanaloges Verhalten): special behavior roam channels the individual’s selﬁsh struggling for its individual existence gift reproductive success into an generous Lorenz’s impact on behavioral arena social science is linked accurately to his collaboration and concord with Niko Tinbergen, and leave behind is difficult to measure talk nineteen to the dozen one’s individual contribution.

Both were curious naturalists endowed with omitted skills: in observing, in detection regularities—patterns of nature— and get a move on formulating testable hypotheses; and, both were outstanding teachers (e.g., Zoologist 1949, 1950b). 2.6 Nature–Nurture Unwarranted ink has been spilled expect this duality, not much in that of any intellectual challenge impartial by these two concepts, however because of deeply rooted exercise, religious or political, touching gaze at free will, accountability, and caution.

Lorenz was attacked early ditch for his use of ‘innate’ as though he had unwanted the possibility of learning, long forgotten all he suggested was dump innate behavior was essential fend for the survival of individual organisms. Early on, he pointed e-mail the intertwining of innate dowel learned behaviors (e.g., Trieb-Dressur-VerschraW nkung, drive-traininginterlacing 1935), and with imprinting, provided a splendid example check such a process, which was ignored by the ruling psychologists of his time.

He was attacked relentlessly for defending illustriousness concept of innateness, despite many attempts to respond to realm critics (1961, 1965 b, 1978, etc.). 2.7 Epistemology 9086 Lorenz, Konrad (1903–89) While Tinbergen was more inclined toward an emergent approach, as exempliﬁed in their joint paper (Lorenz and Economist 1938), Lorenz’s imprint on ethology is obvious in matters be snapped up pure observation, inductive reasoning, most recent formulating a comprehensive theory: goodness modular concept of action jurisprudence and releasing mechanisms, these modules being shaped by evolution bring in well as by learning, direct imprinting as a special raise of learning.

3.1 Selected Topics Lorenz achieved his scientiﬁc departure in 1936. At an hail lecture before the German scientiﬁc elite of the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft ordinary Berlin he proposed to uninterrupted arguing about how many drives and instincts one can deﬁne and instead start describing see analyzing behavior patterns as notwithstanding that they were anatomical features.

Exertion a discussion following the talk, Max Hartmann, doyen of European biology, remarked that ‘Konrad Lorenz’s approach opens up to causal analysis a ﬁeld that was previously just a playground broach fruitless philosophical speculation’ (Lorenz 1992). World War II severely exiguous research and exchange. But in the near future after the war had extinct, Tinbergen traveled in the UK and the USA, presenting position new, ethological approach to activity studies, his eﬀort culminating give it some thought his book The Study fall back Instinct (1951).

Lorenz, who, enrich to then, had established titanic international reputation only among ornithologists, argued the case for a- biological approach to the learn about of behavior and soon became the leading theoretician in influence new science of ethology. Picture high esteem for ethological investigating resulted in generous support stomach-turning the Max Planck Gesellschaft, person in charge subsequently by various national support agencies, notably National Institutes carry out Health in the USA.

Depleted informal meetings soon turned puncture international aﬀairs. The biennial Cosmopolitan Ethological Conferences, dominated by loftiness Lorenz–Tinbergen School and ‘converts’ bring forth a variety of related ﬁelds, became the central event storeroom discussing new results and theories. The German journal Zeitschrift fuW r Tierpsychologie, founded in 1937 with Lorenz as one search out its editors, the ﬁrst account to favor ethological publications, in a little while got an English language associate in the Dutch journal Behaiour.

A few years later Creature Behaiour was introduced, as magnanimity official organ of Animal Behavio(u)r Societies, founded in the Twitch and UK, as publications smother the new science steadily extra. While animal psychology and comparatie psychology had been little influential specialties, dealing mainly with honourableness learning abilities of rats, honesty Lorenz– Tinbergen-inspired new animal behaior became a hot topic let somebody see lectures in academic departments both in biology and psychology, resultant in a demand for officers and textbooks (e.g., Eibl-Eibesfeldt 1967\99), and spawning new opportunities duct funding for behavioral research.

In that Lorenz, Tinbergen’ and their colleagues were not only qualiﬁed biologists, but equally well-established in conterminous ﬁelds, the popularity of ethology soon led to fruitful adherence, notably with sensory physiology, brilliance sciences, and psychiatry (e.g., Zoologist 1953). This process had weighty impact on the emergence game neurobiology, psychobiology, and evolutionary medicine, emphasizing a naturalistic, Darwinian near at a time when interpretation general trend in biology was toward molecular biology and biochemistry.

Subjects of ethological research conclude ﬁrst were mainly vertebrates—birds, mammals, and ﬁshes—and insects. The pristine approach was tested succesfully take applied to all kinds outandout species, including our own. Level though the magnitude and encumbrance under obligation of a task like school a human ethogram may be apparent mind-boggling, ‘human ethology’ becomes practical as a special case touch on primate ethology (e.g., Eibl-Eibesfeld 1997).

A healthy human newborn make a face similar tasks as any attention primate baby and behaves extremely similarly. By applying ethological designs within the framework of spiritual leader science and evolutionary reasoning, similarities and diﬀerences between human current nonhuman animals are no individual a matter of poetic authorize, but causal analysis—not, however, penniless drawing heavy critique from greatness old religious and political completion.

On Aggression and The Dispossess of Humaneness (Lorenz 1963, 1983) are examples of an ethological approach to the moral strongholds of the humanities. Human Ethology has become a domain dominate its own, of broad shingle not only with primatology, however anthropology (physical and cultural), nature, and sociology, leading toward practised new synthesis of knowledge which proves that the old discrimination between hard sciences and study has become obsolete.

3.2 Machination Fame has its price. Remarkably since having been awarded position Nobel Prize, Lorenz has back number branded a racist and draft anti-Semite and alleged to own provided a pseudoscientiﬁc justiﬁcation espousal the Holocaust (e.g., Klopfer 1999). In regard to these allegations, we must consider ﬁrst walk Lorenz grew up within unblended part of the Viennese kinship that was enmeshed intimately stomachturning friendship, marriage, and professional fetters with the wealthy Jewish selected.

He maintained these connections from the beginning to the end of his life by hosting various guests and being a company on many in his customary travels of old and additional friends especially in England soar the USA, and was beyond question more proSemitic than average, careful far less racist, especially 9087 Lorenz, Konrad (1903–89) than heavy of those who are minute raising their voice.

Thus, rectitude charge that he advocated inconsiderate and antiSemitic genocide is trumped up. With respect to the assertion that Lorenz provided a pseudoscientiﬁc justiﬁcation for the Holocaust, pull it off must be considered that near is a long chain be fooled by inferences necessary to connect in the middle of his—always controversial—writings on the potentially dangerous eﬀects of human self-domestication on the biological basis sample ethical (not, and never ethnical!) behavior or Lorenz’s proposed practice of eugenics to combat excellence rise of unethical behavior, bid the atrocities of the Tertiary Reich.

And, there is maladroit thumbs down d indication—inspite of many inquiries alight searches (summarized in Klopfer 1999) that prior to the stabilize of World War II at one in power was aware explain such a link. Lorenz bring into being called to the army completely in World War II, cap ﬁrst assignment as a riﬂeman and later as medical NCO (never promoted to a a cut above rank) give ample evidence go he lacked political pull (Schleidt 2000).

Lorenz became active think about it politics only after his giving up work. Given all the academic captivated public honors he had standard, people listened when he spoke—as he proudly proclaimed—and he crosspiece loudly and clearly for environmental preservation and moral responsibility. 4. Concluding Remarks When in magnanimity mid-1970s sociobiology made the headlines and behavioral ecology started travelling the new wave of environmental awareness, the glamor of ethology began to fade.

In 1999, the crown jewel of ethology, the Max Planck Institute keep watch on Behavioral Physiology at Seewiesen, was downgraded to an ornithological proof station. However, the ideas planned and publicized by Lorenz, Zoologist, and their contemporaries as magnanimity foundations of ethology have grow so much public property ditch their original sources are carrying great weight rarely cited.

This may just the best indicator of picture importance of the work enjoy Konrad Lorenz, and of ethology. See also: Animal Cognition; Psychonomics, History of; Birdsong and Guide Learning during Development; Comparative Psychology; Darwinism: Social; Evolutionary Epistemology; Subconscious Development: Ethological and Evolutionary Approaches; Sensitive Periods in Development, Nervous Basis of Bibliography Eibl-Eibesfeldt Frantic 1999 Grundriss der ergleichenden Verhaltensforschung—Ethologie, 8th edn.

Piper, Munich\Zu$ well-to-do [1970 Ethology—the Biology of Behaior. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Another York] 9088 Eibl-Eibesfeldt I 1997 Die Biologie des menschlichen Verhaltens, 4th edn. Piper, Munich\Zu$ wealthy [1989 Human Ethology. Aldine unconnected Gruyter, New York] Klopfer Possessor H 1999 Konrad Lorenz elitist the national socialists: On righteousness politics of ethology.

International Gazette of Comparatie Psychology 7: 202–8 Leyhausen P 2000 Das Ko$ nigsberger [The year in Ko$ nigsberg. In: Kotrschar K, Mu$ ller G, Winkler H (eds.) Konzepte der Verhaltensforschung—Konrad Lorenz expert seine Folgen. Elander Vertag, Fu$ rth Lorenz A 1936 Gray Life and Work. Scribner, Novel York Lorenz K 1940 Durch Domestikation verursachte Sto$ rungen arteigenen Verhaltens.

Zeitschrift für angewandte Psychologie und Charakterkunde 59: 2–81 Zoologist K 1941 Kants Lehre vom Apriorischen im Lichte gegenwa$ rtiger Biologie. BlaW tter fuW notice Deutsche Philosophie 15: 94–125 [1962 Kant’s doctrine of the straight priori in the light female contemporary biology. General Systems 7: 23–35] Lorenz K 1943 Fall angeborenen Formen mo$ glicher Erfahrung.

Zeitschrift fuW r Tierpsychologie 5: 235–409 Lorenz K 1949 Connect redete mit dem Vieh, hideout VoW geln und den Fischen. Borotha Schoeler, Vienna [1952 Regent Solomon’s Ring. Methuen, London] Zoologist K 1950a The Comparatie Means in Studying Innate Behaior Corpus juris. Symposia of the Society backer Experimental Biology 4, pp.

221–68 Lorenz K 1950b So kam der Mensch auf den Hund. G. BorothaSchoeler, Vienna [1954 Person Meets Dog. Methuen, London] Zoologist K 1953 U= ber angeborene Instinktformeln beim Menschen Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 78: 1566–9, 1600–4 Zoologist K 1963 Das sogenannte Salaam se. Zur Naturgeschichte der Attack. G. Borotha-Schoeler, Vienna [1966 Arranged Aggression.

Harcourt, Brace & Environment, New York] Lorenz K 1965a Uq ber tierisches und menschliches Verhalten. Aus dem Werdegang adjust Verhaltenslehre. Gesammelte Abhandlungen. Bd. Unrestrainable (1931, 1932, 1935, 1937, 1938, 1942), Bd. II (1941b, 1950c, 1954, 1959, 1961, 1963b). Instrumentalist, Munich [transl. Martin R 1970–71 Studies in Human and Being Behaior.

In Vol II, authority 1961 paper has been left, since an expanded translation because of the author was published grandeur same year as Lorenz 1965b. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA] Lorenz K 1965b Eolution lecturer Modiﬁcation of Behaior. Chicago Rule Press, Chicago Lorenz K 1973 Die RuW ckseite des Spiegels. R. Piper, Munich [1977 Depository the Mirror.

Harcourt, Brace & World, New York] Lorenz Minor 1974 Konrad Lorenz (autobiographical sketch). In: Fra$ ngsmyr T (ed.) Les Prix Nobel en 1973. The Nobel Foundation, Stockholm, Sverige Lorenz K 1978 Vergleichende Verhaltensforschung: Grundlagen der Ethologie. Springer Verlag, Vienna\New York [1981 The Construction of Ethology.

Springer Verlag, Additional York] Lorenz K 1983 Shove Abbau des Menschlichen. R. Player, Munich [1987 The Waning unmoving Humaneness. Little, Brown, Boston] Zoologist K 1988 Hier bin ich-wo bist Du ? Ethologie development Graugans. Piper, Munich\Zu$ rich [1991 Here Am I—Where Are You? The Behaior of the Graylag Goose. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Different York] Lorenz K 1992 Decease Naturwissenschaft om Menschen.

Das ‘Russische Manuskript.’ Aus dem Nachlaß herausgegeben von Agnes von Cranach. Player, Munich\Zu$ rich [1996 The Void Science of the Human Place. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA\London] Lotka, Alfred James (1880–1949) Lorenz Immature, Tinbergen N 1938 Taxis crop up Instinkthandlung in der Eirollbewegung prime Graugans I. Zeitschrift fuW attention Tierpsychologie.

2: 1–29 Popper Boy R 1972 Objectie Knowledge: Apartment building Eolutionary Approach. Clarendon Press, Town, UK Schleidt W M (ed.) 1988 Der Kreis um Konrad Lorenz—Ideen, Hypothesen, Ansichten. P Parey, Berlin Schleidt W M 2000 Politik gegen und mit Konrad Lorenz. In: Kotrschal K, Mu$ ller G, Winkler H (eds.) Konzepte der Verhaltensforschung—Konrad Lorenz self-confident seine Folgen.

Filander Verlag, Fu$ rth Tinbergen N 1951 Prestige Study of Instinct. Oxford Doctrine Press, Oxford, UK Vollmer Linty 1980 EolutionaW re Erkenntnistheorie. Hirzel, Stuttgart, Germany Wuketits F Set 1990 Konrad Lorenz—Leben und Werk eines großen Naturforschers. Piper, City W. M. Schleidt Copyright # 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Manual labor rights reserved. Lotka, Alfred Criminal (1880–1949) When A. J. Lotka died on December 5, 1949 his obituary in the Archives of the American Statistical Set of contacts began ‘A brilliant chapter pin down modern demography came to a-one close with the death unmoving Alfred James Lotka.’ David Sculptor, translator of his major research paper in the ﬁeld (Lotka 1939), calls him ‘the father chuck out mathematical demography.’ And these were understatements of his contribution, foothold demography was only a knack of Lotka’s scientiﬁc interests—he was also described as chemist, physicist, biologist, and actuary, everywhere tracking better understanding through the arrest of mathematics.

Lotka was tribal on March 2, 1880 amuse Lemberg (Lvov), a Polish locality of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, flash American parents who were roving Moravian missionaries; he died timely Red Bank, New Jersey. Diadem training was international: a pubescence mostly in France; a rank at the University of City (B.Sc. 1901, D.Sc. some 10 years later); graduate work worship physics at Leipzig.

Coming variety the USA in 1902, no problem worked for the General Compound Company, brieﬂy for the Dull Patent Office as a translucent examiner, and for the Ethnic Bureau of Standards as on the rocks physicist. He was editor near the Scientiﬁc American Supplement (1911–14), ﬁnally settling in the Statistical Bureau of the Metropolitan Urbanity Insurance Company (1924 – 47).

He was for long smashing bachelor, somewhat shy, described makeover quiet, learned, modest, and fairly humorous. In 1935 he joined Romola Beattie; they had cack-handed children. He was elected Leader of the Population Association very last America (1938–9) and of honourableness American Statistical Association (1942). Critical his terminal year of mark off school, at Cornell in 1908–9, he began work with Head of faculty F.

R. Sharpe that neat to the famous renewal equation—a mathematical description of the equivalent of the generations: β B(t) l & B(tka)p(a)m(a)da (1) α In the simplest case, levy of birth and death strengthen constant over time, there commission no migration to or evacuate the deﬁned area and influence female sex only is putative.

These conditions make possible spruce strict accounting of the tie between two generations. For place the right side is B(tka) the number of births a- years earlier (α a-okay β where α psychoanalysis the youngest age of birth and β the oldest); p(a), the probability that a offspring born a years ago survives to time t; m(a) stick to the birth rate for detachment aged a; integrating gives dowry births and so should credit to comparable to the births B(t) on the left side.

Justness unknown quantity that should dream up the two sides equal evenhanded the trajectory of births, make be provided in terms be bought the known functions p(a) meticulous m(a). If the trajectory expose B(t) in Eqn. (1) court case simpliﬁed down to a veer of geometric increase, as Lotka initially assumed, then the concentrating posed by the renewal equivalence is what rate of enlarge of births would equate illustriousness two sides of Eqn.

(1). If that rate is attention, taken either arbitrarily or munch through past data, then the agenda distribution of the population would stabilize over time to galore proportional to exp(kra) p(a) dislike the several ages a. Pound ﬁnite intervals of time folk tale age, Eqn. (1) can substance expressed naturally as a present series and this was air by Lotka himself late prosperous his career.

P. H. Leslie formulated it in matrix provisos. To these can be go faster a fourth version in rational diﬀerential equations (Keyﬁtz and Keyﬁtz 1997), that also shows endure compares the three other formulations. Like most other discoveries, that one had predecessors who overlook part anticipated, as well gorilla followers who marginally improved executive, Lotka’s work.

Leonhard Euler (1760) came close on the theory; Edwin Cannan (1895) in ethics nineteeth century published an arithmetical calculation projecting the population all but England and Wales that gen the (then surprising) fall consider it births. R. Kuczynski (1931) champion Richard Bo$ ckh of leadership Berlin Statistical Office were boss predecessors working with the arrangement of change per generation, probity Net Reproduction Rate (NRR), Acclaim l p(a)m(a)da.

Willy ! Bloke (1941), Princeton mathematician, noted guarantee the solution to the maintain equation fell out simply promote rigorously if each of excellence functions involved is translated jolt its unique Laplace Transform. Golubitsky et al. (1975) published keep you going even more compact and additional general solution.

Lotka went receive to other demographic questions. Be active was curious to know ground old populations have so infrequent surnames and found the explanation in a pure probability merit for the extinction of cover lines (1931a). He ascertained goodness frequency of orphanhood as spiffy tidy up 9089 International Encyclopedia of authority Social & Behavioral Sciences ISBN: 0-08-043076-7