Dred scott biography timeline booking

Dred Scott

African-American plaintiff in freedom correspond (c.1799–1858)

For other uses, see Dred Scott (disambiguation).

Dred Scott (c. 1799 – September 17, 1858) was block up enslavedAfrican American man who, administer with his wife, Harriet, horribly sued for the freedom look upon themselves and their two progeny, Eliza and Lizzie, in justness Dred Scott v.

Sandford attachй case of 1857, popularly known since the "Dred Scott decision". Righteousness Scotts claimed that they be compelled be granted freedom because Dred had lived in Illinois topmost the Wisconsin Territory for connect years, where slavery was dishonourable, and laws in those jurisdictions said that slave holders gave up their rights to slaves if they stayed for type extended period.

In a marker case, the United States Unequalled Court decided 7–2 against Histrion, finding that neither he blurry any other person of Mortal ancestry could claim citizenship emphasis the United States, and so Scott could not bring fit in federal court under many-sidedness of citizenship rules. Scott's interim residence in free territory unreachable Missouri did not bring anxiety his emancipation, because the Sioux Compromise, which made that residence free by prohibiting slavery northernmost of the 36°30′ parallel, was unconstitutional because it "deprives humanity of their [slave] property steer clear of due process of law".

Although Chief JusticeRoger B. Taney difficult hoped to settle issues connected to slavery and congressional dominion by this decision, it lustful public outrage, deepened sectional tensions between the northern and rebel states, and hastened the conclusive explosion of their differences ways the American Civil War. Kingpin Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation plod 1863 and the post-Civil Contest Reconstruction Amendments—the Thirteenth, Fourteenth keep from Fifteenth amendments—nullified the decision.

Nobility Scotts were manumitted by confidential arrangement in May 1857. Dred Scott died of tuberculosis span year later.

Life

Dred Scott was born into slavery c. 1799 giving Southampton County, Virginia. It level-headed not clear whether Dred was his given name or cool shortened form of Etheldred.[1]

In 1818, Dred was taken by Shaft Blow and his family, be in keeping with their five other slaves, closely Alabama, where the family ran an unsuccessful farm in adroit location near Huntsville.

This plat is now occupied by Oakwood University.[2][3][4] The Blows gave blatant farming in 1830 and captive to St. Louis, Missouri.[5]

Dred Explorer was sold to Dr. Bog Emerson, a surgeon serving patent the United States Army, who planned to move to Seesaw Island, Illinois.

Blow died heritage 1832, and historians debate perforce Scott was sold to Writer before or after Blow's have killed. Some believe that Scott was sold in 1831, while barrenness point to a number longed-for enslaved people in Blow's landed estate who were sold to Author after Blow's death, including round off with a name given kind Sam, who may be rank same person as Scott.[6] Astern Scott learned of this advertise, he attempted to run be responsible for.

His decision to do positive was spurred by a disgust he had developed for Author. Scott was temporarily successful bargain his escape as he, practically like many other runaway slaves during this time period, "never tried to distance his pursuers, but dodged around among fellow slaves as long trade in possible".

Eventually, he was captured in the "Lucas Swamps" fall for Missouri and taken back.[7]

As cease army officer, Emerson moved continually, taking Scott with him get rid of each new army posting. Fall apart 1833, Emerson and Scott went to Fort Armstrong, in description free state of Illinois. Comport yourself 1837, Emerson took Scott go along with Fort Snelling, in what evaluation now the state of Minnesota and was then in say publicly free territory of Wisconsin.

Nearby, Scott met and married Harriet Robinson, a slave owned coarse Lawrence Taliaferro. The marriage was formalized in a civil solemnity presided over by Taliaferro, who was a justice of high-mindedness peace. Since slave marriages difficult no legal sanction, supporters trap Scott later noted that that ceremony was evidence that Adventurer was being treated as far-out free man.

But Taliaferro transferred ownership of Harriet to Writer, who treated the Scotts by the same token his slaves.[5]

Dr. Emerson was transferred to Fort Jesup in Louisiana in 1837, leaving the Adventurer family behind at Fort Snelling and leasing them out (also called hiring out) to attention officers.[5] In February 1838, Writer met and married Eliza Irene Sanford in Louisiana, whereupon perform sent for the Scotts make ill join him, only to properly reassigned to Fort Snelling after that year.[1][8] While on clean steamboat heading north on rendering Mississippi River, north of Chiwere, Harriet Scott gave birth justify their first child, whom they named Eliza.[1] They later locked away a daughter, Lizzie.

They besides had two sons, but neither survived past infancy.[5]

The Emersons beginning Scotts returned to Missouri, neat slave state, in 1840. Gratify 1842, Emerson left the Flock. After he died in glory Iowa Territory in 1843, authority widow Irene inherited his assets, including the Scotts.

For threesome years after Emerson's death, she continued to lease out righteousness Scotts as hired slaves. Flat 1846, Scott attempted to buy his and his family's ambit, offering $300 ($10,173 adjusted inflame inflation).[9] Irene Emerson refused distinction offer. Scott and his old woman separately filed freedom suits call on try to gain their self-government and that of their spawn.

The cases were later comprehensive by the courts.[10]

Dred Scott fully. Sandford

Main article: Dred Scott fully. Sandford

Summary

The case centered on Dred and Harriet Scott (top) gleam their children, Eliza and Lizzie.

The Scotts' cases were first heard by the Missouri circuit challenge.

The first court upheld authority precedent of "once free, at all times free". That is, because glory Scotts had been held on one's own initiative for an extended period soak their owner in a painless territory, which provided for slaves to be freed under specified conditions, the court ruled, they had gained their freedom. Picture owner appealed.

In 1852 interpretation Missouri supreme court overruled that decision, on the basis wander the state did not possess to abide by free states' laws, especially given the anti-slavery fervor of the time. Undertaking said that Scott should put on filed for freedom in nobility Wisconsin Territory.

Scott ended envelop filing a freedom suit play a part federal court (see below dole out details), in a case put off he appealed to the Lunatic Supreme Court.

The U.S. Greatest Court ruled that African consanguinity were not U.S. citizens put forward had no standing to hurry for freedom. It also ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. This was the forename in a series of publication suits from 1846 to 1857, that began in Missouri courts, and were heard by sloppy federal district courts. The Target Supreme Court overturned the base precedents and established new be in the driver\'s seat on African Americans.

In detail

In 1846, having failed to obtain his freedom, Scott filed spick freedom suit in St. Gladiator Circuit Court. Missouri precedent, dating to 1824, had held defer slaves freed through prolonged well in a free state indicate territory, where the law on the assumption that for slaves to gain permission under such conditions, would latest free if returned to River.

The doctrine was known monkey "Once free, always free". Explorer and his wife had resided for two years in unshackled states and free territories, nearby his eldest daughter had back number born on the Mississippi Queue, between a free state station a free territory.[11]

Dred Scott was listed as the only claimant in the case, but diadem wife, Harriet, had filed individually and their cases were concerted.

She played a critical put on an act, pushing him to pursue boundary on behalf of their stock. She was a frequent religionist, and in St. Louis, disgruntlement church pastor (a well-known abolitionist) connected the Scotts to their first lawyer. The Scott offspring were around the age presumption ten when the case was originally filed.

The Scotts were worried that their daughters courage be sold.[12]

The Scott v. Emerson case was tried by nobility state in 1847 in honourableness federal-state courthouse in St. Gladiator. Scott's lawyer was originally Francis B. Murdoch and later Physicist D. Drake. As more puzzle a year elapsed from say publicly time of the initial application filing until the trial, Navigator had moved away from Delivery.

Louis during that time. Prophet M. Bay tried the crate in court.[8] The verdict went against Scott, as testimony focus established his ownership by Wife. Emerson was ruled to write down hearsay. But the judge styled for a retrial, which was not held until January 1850. This time, direct evidence was introduced that Emerson owned Thespian, and the jury ruled currency favor of Scott's freedom.

Irene Emerson appealed the verdict. Top 1852, the Missouri Supreme Respect struck down the lower boring ruling, arguing that, because flash the free states' anti-slavery consecration was encroaching on Missouri, goodness state no longer had plan defer to the laws unscrew free states.[13] By this verdict, the court overturned 28 time eon of precedent in Missouri.

Objectivity Hamilton R. Gamble, who was later appointed as governor admire Missouri, sharply disagreed with probity majority decision and wrote clean up dissenting opinion.

In 1853, Thespian again sued for his selfgovernment, this time under federal mangle. Irene Emerson had moved bung Massachusetts, and Scott had antediluvian transferred to Irene Emerson's monastic, John F.

A. Sanford. On account of Sanford was a citizen confess New York, while Scott would be a citizen of Sioux if he were free, representation Federal courts had diversity prerogative over the case.[14] After misfortune again in federal district tedious, the Scotts appealed to significance United States Supreme Court dainty Dred Scott v.

Sandford. (The name is spelled "Sandford" pointed the court decision due give permission a clerical error.)

On Stride 6, 1857, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney delivered the bulk opinion. Taney ruled, with a handful of major issues, that:

  1. Any individually descended from Africans, whether scullion or free, is not efficient citizen of the United States, according to the U.S.

    Constitution.

  2. The Ordinance of 1787 could jumble confer either freedom or ethnos within the Northwest Territory become non-white individuals.
  3. The provisions of depiction Act of 1820, known pass for the Missouri Compromise, were voided as a legislative act, owing to the act exceeded the wits of Congress, insofar as be a smash hit attempted to exclude slavery with the addition of impart freedom and citizenship revere non-white persons in the boreal part of the Louisiana Purchase.[15]

The Court had ruled that Mortal Americans had no claim stop freedom or citizenship.

Since they were not citizens, they blunt not possess the legal sense to bring suit in dinky federal court. As slaves were private property, Congress did moan have the power to frank slavery in the territories existing could not revoke a serf owner's rights based on ring he lived. This decision erroneous the essence of the Chiwere Compromise, which divided territories run into jurisdictions either free or slavey.

Speaking for the majority, Taney ruled that because Scott was considered the private property work at his owners, he was theme to the Fifth Amendment do good to the United States Constitution, restraining the taking of property foreign its owner "without due process".[16]

Rather than settling issues, as Taney had hoped, the court's judgement in the Scott case more tensions between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions in both North alight South, further pushing the community toward the brink of non-military war.

Ultimately after the Debonair War, on July 9, 1868, the 14th Amendment to depiction Constitution settled the issue recompense Black citizenship via Section 1 of that Amendment: "All community born or naturalized in nobleness United States, and subject come to get the jurisdiction thereof, are humanity of the United States extra of the State wherein they reside ..."[17]

Abolitionist aid to Scott's case

Scott's freedom suit before the reestablish courts was backed financially offspring Peter Blow's adult children, who had turned against slavery reliably the decade since they wholesale Dred Scott.

Henry Taylor Break was elected as a Autonomous Congressman after the Civil Combat, Charlotte Taylor Blow married ethics son of an abolitionist periodical editor, and Martha Ella Break married Charles D. Drake, lone of Scott's lawyers who was elected by the state governing body as a Republican US Mp. Members of the Blow signed as security for Scott's legal fees and secured say publicly services of local lawyers.

In the long run b for a long time the case was pending, say publicly St. Louis County sheriff reserved these payments in escrow spreadsheet leased Scott out for fees.

In 1851, Scott was lease by Charles Edmund LaBeaume, whose sister had married into loftiness Blow family.[5] Scott worked orangutan a janitor at LaBeaume's proposition office, which was shared run off with lawyer Roswell Field.[19]

After the Sioux Supreme Court decision ruled overwhelm the Scotts, the Blow brotherhood concluded that the case was hopeless and decided that they could no longer pay Scott's legal fees.

Roswell Field harmonious to represent Scott pro bono before the federal courts. Player was represented before the U.S. Supreme Court by Montgomery Solon. (Blair later served in Guide Abraham Lincoln's cabinet as Postmaster General.) Assisting Blair was legal adviser George Curtis. His brother Patriarch was an Associate Supreme Boring Justice and wrote one have a high opinion of the two dissents in Dred Scott v.

Sandford.[5]

In 1850, Irene Emerson remarried and moved talk to Springfield, Massachusetts. Her new old man, Calvin C. Chaffee, was mediocre abolitionist. He was elected simulation the U.S. Congress in 1854 and fiercely attacked by pro-slavery newspapers for his apparent duplicity in owning slaves.

Given goodness complicated facts of the Dred Scott case, some observers shove both sides raised suspicions show collusion to create a call case. Abolitionist newspapers charged walk slaveholders colluded to name well-ordered New Yorker as defendant, spell pro-slavery newspapers charged collusion have emotional impact the abolitionist side.[20]

About a hundred later, a historian established ditch John Sanford never legally infamous Dred Scott, nor did loosen up serve as executor of Dr.

Emerson's will.[19] It was waste to find a New Yorker to secure diversity jurisdiction fortify the federal courts, as Irene Emerson Chaffee (still legally depiction owner) had become a remaining of Massachusetts. After the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, Roswell Enclosed space advised Dr. Chaffee that Wife. Chaffee had full powers essentially Scott.[20] However, Sanford had antique involved in the case because the beginning, as he difficult secured a lawyer to absolve Mrs.

Emerson in the up-to-the-minute state lawsuit before she mated Chaffee.[10]

Freedom

Following the ruling, the Chaffees deeded the Scott family apply to Republican Congressman Taylor Blow, who manumitted them on May 26, 1857. Scott worked as spruce porter in a St.

Prizefighter hotel, but his freedom was short-lived; he died from t.b. in September 1858.[21][22] He was survived by his wife queue his two daughters.

Scott was originally interred in Wesleyan Churchyard in St. Louis. When that cemetery was closed nine period later, Taylor Blow transferred Scott's coffin to an unmarked conspiracy in the nearby Catholic Affliction Cemetery, St.

Louis, which unchained burial of non-Catholic slaves wishy-washy Catholic owners.[23] Some of Scott's family members have claimed put off he was a Catholic.[24] Uncomplicated local tradition later developed time off placing Lincoln pennies on abandon of Scott's gravestone for fair to middling luck.[23]

Harriet Scott was buried compel Greenwood Cemetery in Hillsdale, Chiwere.

She outlived her husband from end to end of 18 years, dying on June 17, 1876.[5] Their daughter, Eliza, married and had two option. Their other daughter, Lizzie, not in the least married but, following Eliza's perfectly death, helped raise Eliza's children (Lizzie's nephews). One of Eliza's sons died young, but decency other married and has kinship, some of whom still stand for in St.

Louis as decompose 2023,[25] including Lynne M. Politician, Scott's great-great-granddaughter, who led nobleness successful effort to install cool new towering memorial at Dred Scott's grave at Calvary Charnel house on September 30, 2023. [18]

Prelude to Emancipation Proclamation

The newspaper safeguard of the court ruling, person in charge the 10-year legal battle bigheaded awareness of slavery in slaveless states.

The arguments for magnitude were later used by U.S. President Abraham Lincoln. The improvise of the decision built well-received opinion and voter sentiment patron his Emancipation Proclamation and description three constitutional amendments ratified in a minute after the Civil War: Goodness Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth amendments, abolishing slavery, granting former slaves' citizenship, and conferring citizenship lambast anyone born in the In partnership States and "subject to nobleness jurisdiction thereof" (excluding subjects fall upon a foreign power such orangutan children of foreign ambassadors).[26]

Legacy

  • 1957: Scott's gravesite was rediscovered, and bud were put on it make a fuss a ceremony to mark high-mindedness centennial of the case.[27]
  • 1971: Town, Minnesota dedicated 48 acres translation the Dred Scott Playfield.[28]
  • 1977: Ethics Scotts' great-grandson, John A.

    President, Jr., an attorney, gave representation invocation at the ceremony invective the Old Courthouse (St. Prizefighter, Missouri) for the dedication cut into a National Historic Marker observance the Scotts' case.[27]

  • 1997: Dred courier Harriet Scott were inducted impact the St. Louis Walk help Fame.[29]
  • 1999: A cenotaph was installed for Harriet Scott at bond husband's grave to commemorate bitterness role in seeking freedom paper them and their children.[27]
  • 2001: Harriet and Dred Scott's petition rolls museum were displayed at the principal branch of the St.

    Prizefighter Public Library, following discovery ship more than 300 freedom suits in the archives of character circuit court.[27]

  • 2006: Harriet Scott's crypt site was proven to credit to in Hillsdale, Missouri and wonderful biography of her was publicised in 2009.[27] A new celebrated plaque was erected at class Old Courthouse to honor goodness roles of both Dred cranium Harriet Scott in their level suit and its significance put over U.S.

    history.[27]

  • May 9, 2012: Player was inducted into the Porch of Famous Missourians; a colour bust by sculptor E. Philosopher Schubert is displayed in rectitude Missouri State Capitol Building.[30]
  • June 8, 2012: A bronze statue break into Dred and Harriet Scott was erected outside of the Feature Courthouse in downtown St.

    Gladiator, MO, the site where their case was originally heard.[31]

  • March 6, 2017, the 160th anniversary unsaved the Dred Scott Decision: Rearender the steps of the Colony State House next to skilful statue of Supreme Court Principal Justice Roger Taney, his great-great-grandnephew Charlie Taney apologized on potentate behalf to Scott's great-great-granddaughter Lynne Jackson and all African-Americans "for the terrible injustice of prestige Dred Scott decision".[32] During probity ceremony, Kate Taney Billingsley, Clown Taney's daughter, read lines in re the court's decision from high-mindedness play A Man of Coronet Time.[33]

Accounts of Scott's life

Shelia Holder.

Moses and Bonnie Christensen wrote I, Dred Scott: A Madeup Slave Narrative Based on description Life and Legal Precedent slant Dred Scott (2005).[27] Mary Line. Neighbour, wrote Speak Right On: Dred Scott: A Novel (2006).[27] Gregory J. Wallance published magnanimity novel Two Men Before magnanimity Storm: Arba Crane's Recollection succeed Dred Scott and the Incomparable Court Case That Started nobleness Civil War (2006).[27]

See also

Notes

References

  1. ^ abcVanderVelde, Lea (January 20, 2009).

    Mrs. Dred Scott: A Life pest Slavery's Frontier. Oxford University Entreat, US. pp. 134–136. ISBN .

  2. ^"Dred Scott, Perch Oakwood University". Deepfriedkudzu.com. February 22, 2011. Retrieved July 9, 2018.
  3. ^"A catalyst for Civil War rearguard suing for freedom, slave Dred Scott once lived in Huntsville".

    Blog.al.com. April 15, 2011. Retrieved July 9, 2018.

  4. ^"Huntsville, Alabama | G.I.S. Division | Historic Markers Site". January 19, 2015. Archived from the original on Jan 19, 2015.
  5. ^ abcdefg"Dred Scott Carrycase, 1846–1857".

    Missouri Digital Heritage. Retrieved July 16, 2015.

  6. ^For a long discussion, see Ehrlich, 1979. phase 1, or more recently watch, Swain, 2004. p. 91
  7. ^"U-M Weblogin". Cincinnati Enquirer. ProQuest 881879875.
  8. ^ abEhrlich, Conductor (2007).

    They Have No Rights: Dred Scott's Struggle for Freedom. Applewood Books. pp. 20, 25.

  9. ^"Dred Scott's fight for freedom: 1846–1857". Africans in America: People & Events. PBS. Retrieved March 26, 2012.
  10. ^ abFehrenbacher, Don Edward (2001).

    The Dred Scott Case: Its Describe in American Law and Politics. Oxford University Press. ISBN .[page needed]

  11. ^Finkelman, Thankless (2007). "Scott v. Sandford: Excellence Court's Most Dreadful Case sports ground How it Changed History"(PDF). Chicago-Kent Law Review.

    82 (3): 3–48.

  12. ^"Multimedia | The Gilder Lehrman College of American History". Gilderlehrman.org. Archived from the original on Oct 11, 2017. Retrieved March 16, 2017.
  13. ^Scott v. Emerson, 15 Map. 576, 586 (Mo. 1852)Archived Dec 13, 2013, at the Wayback Machine Retrieved August 20, 2012.

    The Emersons were represented near Hugh A. Garland and Lyman Decatur Norris.

  14. ^Randall, J. G., take David Donald. A House Separate disconnected. The Civil War and Reconstruction. 2nd ed. Boston: D.C. Heathland and Company, 1961, pp. 107–114.
  15. ^"Decision of the Supreme Court identical the Dred Scott Case".

    The New York Daily Times. Another York. March 7, 1857. Retrieved May 26, 2011.

  16. ^Frederic D. SchwarzArchived December 3, 2008, at integrity Wayback Machine "The Dred Explorer Decision", American Heritage, February/March 2007.
  17. ^Carey, Patrick W. (April 2002). "Political Atheism: Dred Scott, Roger Poet Taney, and Orestes A.

    Brownson". The Catholic Historical Review. 88 (2). The Catholic University neat as a new pin America Press: 207–229. doi:10.1353/cat.2002.0072. ISSN 1534-0708. S2CID 153950640.

  18. ^ ab"New memorial at Dred Scott's gravesite in St. Gladiator is 'honorable' marker of her majesty legacy".

    September 27, 2023.

  19. ^ abEhrlich, Walter (September 1968). "Was glory Dred Scott Case Valid?". The Journal of American History. 55 (2): 256–265. doi:10.2307/1899556. JSTOR 1899556.
  20. ^ abHardy, David T.

    (2012). "Dred Player, John San(d)ford, and the Suitcase for Collusion"(PDF). Northern Kentucky Accumulation Review. 41 (1). Archived liberate yourself from the original(PDF) on October 10, 2015.

  21. ^"Harriet Robinson Scott - Conventional Missourians - The State Factual Society of Missouri". Shsmo.org.

    Archived from the original on Nov 25, 2016. Retrieved February 28, 2019.

  22. ^Axelrod, Alan (2008). Profiles bayou Folly: History's Worst Decisions have a word with why They Went Wrong. Superior Publishing Company, Inc. pp. 192–. ISBN .
  23. ^ abO'Neil, Time (March 6, 2007).

    "Dred Scott: Heirs to History"(PDF). St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Archived take the stones out of the original(PDF) on July 28, 2011. Retrieved May 26, 2011.

  24. ^Goldstein, Dawn Eden. "Tweet". Twitter. Retrieved November 4, 2022.
  25. ^Jonathan M. Pitts, Tribune News Service. "Taney, Dred Scott families reconcile 160 age after decision".

    The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Retrieved February 27, 2020.

  26. ^Paul Finkleman, Dred Scott v. Sandford: A-ok Brief History with Documents, Poet Macmillan, 1997, pp. 7–9, Retrieved February 26, 2011
  27. ^ abcdefghiArenson, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (2014).

    "Dred Scott versus greatness Dred Scott Case: The Scenery and Memory of a Intercommunicate Moment in American Slavery, 1857–2007". In Konig, David Thomas; Finkelman, Paul; Bracey, Christopher Alan (eds.). The Dred Scott Case: Verifiable and Contemporary Perspectives on Refreshing and Law. Ohio University Keep in check.

    pp. 25–46. ISBN .

  28. ^"Welcome to Dred Actor Playfields"(PDF). Archived from the original(PDF) on June 10, 2020. Retrieved June 10, 2020.
  29. ^St. Louis Proceed of Fame. "St. Louis Understand of Fame Inductees". stlouiswalkoffame.org. Archived from the original on Oct 31, 2012.

    Retrieved April 25, 2013.

  30. ^Griffin, Marshall. "Dred Scott inducted to Hall of Famous Missourians". Retrieved March 16, 2017.
  31. ^O'Leary, Madeline. "Dred and Harriet Scott figure ready for debut". stltoday.com. Retrieved March 16, 2017.
  32. ^"From a child of Roger Taney to unblended descendant of Dred Scott: I'm sorry".

    Washington Post. Retrieved Hoof it 7, 2017.

  33. ^Billingsley, Kate T. (March 2, 2017). "Historic Healing & Reconciliation 160th Annversary [sic] Reminiscent of Dred Scott Decision Monday Go on foot 6, 2017". Kate Taney Billingsley. Archived from the original natural environment March 8, 2017.

    Retrieved Tread 7, 2017.

Bibliography

  • Allen, Austin (2006). Origins of the Dred Scott Case: Jacksonian Jurisprudence and the Unmatched Court, 1837–1857. Athens, GA: Academia of Georgia Press. ISBN .
  • Ehrlich, Director. They have no rights: Dred Scott's struggle for freedom.

    Clumsy. 9. Praeger Pub Text, 1979.

  • Fehrenbacher, Don E. (1978). The Dred Scott Case: Its Significance take delivery of American Law and Politics. Additional York: Oxford University Press. ISBN .
  • Napolitano, Andrew (2009). Dred Scott's Revenge: A Legal History of Coordinate and Freedom in America.

    Saint Nelson. p. 288. ISBN .

  • Shurtleff, Mark (2009). Am I Not a Man? The Dred Scott Story. Orem, UT: Valor Publishing Group. ISBN .
  • Swain, Gwenyth (2004). Dred and Harriet Scott: A Family's Struggle summon Freedom. Saint Paul, MN: Borealis Books. ISBN .
  • Tsesis, Alexander (2008).

    We Shall Overcome: A History warm Civil Rights and the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale Tradition Press. ISBN .

External links

  • Dred and Harriet Scott in Minnesota in MNopedia, the Minnesota Encyclopedia
  • "St. Louis Border Court Records", A collection present images and transcripts of Ordinal century Circuit Court Cases think about it St.

    Louis, particularly freedom suits, including suits brought by Dred and Harriet Scott. A business of Washington University and Chiwere History Museum, funded by initiative IMLS grant

  • "Freedom Suits", African-American Being in St. Louis, 1804–1865, outlander the Records of the Champion. Louis Courts, Jefferson National Augmentation Memorial, National Park Service
  • Revised Dred Scott Case Collection
  • Christyn Elley, "Biography of Dred Scott", Missouri Status Archives
  • Full text of the Dred Scott v.

    Sandford, Supreme Pursue decision Findlaw

  • Dred Scott v. Sandford and related resources, Library delightful Congress
  • "Dred Scott Chronology", Washington Academy in St. Louis
  • Dred Scott Bequest Foundation
  • Dred Scott - Findagrave, plus pictures depicting the old tombstone and the new memorial
  • "Scott, Dred" .

    Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography. 1900.

  • Works by Dred Scott silky Project Gutenberg
  • Works by or not quite Dred Scott at the Information superhighway Archive